The NMR structure of the 206-residue protein {“type”:”entrez-protein” attrs :{“text”:”NP_346487. further imply that the two domains undergo restricted hinge motions relative to each other in solution. “type”:”entrez-protein” attrs :”text”:”NP_346487.1″ term_id :”15901883″ term_text :”NP_346487.1″NP_346487.1 is so far the largest polypeptide chain to which the J-UNIO structure determination protocol has successfully been applied. strain BL21(DE3) (Novagen). The protein was expressed in M9 minimal medium containing 1 g/L of 15NH4Cl and 4 g/L of [13C6]-protein structure determination. Melatonin The two individual domain structures of “type”:”entrez-protein” attrs :”text”:”NP_346487.1″ term_id :”15901883″ term_text :”NP_346487.1″NP_346487.1 (Table 1 Fig. 3) fit near-identically with the corresponding parts of the protein in crystals. For the core domain the backbone and all-heavy-atom Melatonin RMSD values between the mean atom coordinates of the bundle of 20 NMR conformers and the bundle of four molecules in the crystallographic unit cell are 1.2 Melatonin and 1.8 ? and the corresponding values for the cap domain are 1 respectively.3 and 2.3 ? where the somewhat larger all-heavy-atom RMSD value for the cap domain can be rationalized by its smaller size and concomitantly larger percentage of solvent-exposed Melatonin amino acid residues (Jaudzems et al. 2010). Previously introduced additional criteria for comparison of crystal and NMR structures (Jaudzems et al. 2010; Mohanty et al. 2010; Serrano et al. 2010) showed that the values of the backbone dihedral ? angles and ψ of the crystal structure are outside of the value ranges covered by the bundle of NMR conformers for less than 10 residues. Both the high-precision of the individual domain structures (Table 1) and the close fit with the crystal structure document the success of the use of J-UNIO with this larger protein. Comparison of the complete structures of “type”:”entrez-protein” attrs :”text”:”NP_346487.1″ term_id :”15901883″ term_text :”NP_346487.1″NP_346487.1 in crystals and in solution shows that the range of relative spatial arrangements of the two domains is significantly larger in solution than in the crystal. The four molecules in the asymmetric crystallographic unit cell have nearly identical inter-domain orientations as shown by the superposition of the four structures (black lines in Fig. 2). In solution the superpositions shown in Fig. 2 indicate that the two domains undergo limited-amplitude hinge motions about the double-linker region. The limited range of these motions is due to restraints from NOEs between the linker peptide segment and Rabbit polyclonal to OX40. the globular domains whereas no NOEs were identified between the two domains. There are indications from line broadening of part of the linker residue signals (missing amide proton signals see Fig. 1a) that the hinge motions are in the millisecond to microsecond time range. Measurements of 15N1H-NOEs showed uniform values near + 0.80 for the two domains and across the linker region documenting the absence of high-frequency backbone mobility. Homologous proteins to “type”:”entrez-protein” attrs :”text”:”NP_346487.1″ term_id :”15901883″ term_text :”NP_346487.1″NP_346487.1 have been shown to interact weakly with magnesium ions (the crystal structure of “type”:”entrez-protein” attrs :”text”:”NP_346487.1″ term_id :”15901883″ term_text :”NP_346487.1″NP_346487.1 contains one magnesium ion per molecule) and phosphate ions. Exploratory studies indicated that the addition of either phosphate or Mg2+ to the NMR sample did not visibly affect the structures of the individual domains and had at most very small effects on the plasticity of the intact “type”:”entrez-protein” attrs :”text”:”NP_346487.1″ term_id :”15901883″ term_text :”NP_346487.1″NP_346487.1. These function-related ligand-binding studies will be described elsewhere (K. Jaudzems personal communication). A recent structure determination of a β-barrel fold 200-residue protein with an Melatonin integrative approach “resolution-adapted structural recombination (RASREC) Rosetta” used a wide array of different NMR experiments with multiple differently isotope-labeled protein preparations measured under different solution conditions (Sgourakis et al. 2014). This result was highly acclaimed (Lloyd and Wuttke 2014 and as was correctly stated by one of the reviewers it should not be directly.