Tag Archives: OTS964

Synaptic inputs underlying spike receptive fields (RFs) are key to understanding

Synaptic inputs underlying spike receptive fields (RFs) are key to understanding SIRT5 mechanisms for neuronal processing. shaping of On/Off spatial tunings resulting in a great enhancement of their distinctiveness. Thus slightly separated On/Off excitation together with intervening inhibition can produce simple-cell RF structure and the dichotomy of RF structures may arise from a fine-tuning of the spatial arrangement of synaptic inputs. Simple and complex cells were first defined in the primary visual cortex (V1) of cats according to their unique spike receptive field (RF) structures1. Simple-cell receptive fields are made up of spatially segregated On and Off subregions within which bright and dark stimuli respectively increase the cell’s firing. In contrast complex cells exhibit overlapped On and Off subregions in their RFs1 2 A popular circuit model for simple-cell RFs known as “push-pull” circuit3-7 proposes that this segregation of On and Off subfields results largely from your spatial arrangement of On- and Off-center excitatory inputs from thalamic relay cells while the arrangement of inhibitory inputs is usually thought to be antagonistic to that of the excitatory thalamic inputs5 6 8 9 The push-pull model predicts that inhibitory and excitatory inputs evoked by the same contrast are largely segregated spatially and that inhibition does not contribute significantly to the segregation of the On and Off subfields. However several experimental results contradict this model. Firstly an intracellular study in cats has suggested that this On and Off responses of simple cells may consist of both excitatory and inhibitory inputs10. Second of all blocking GABA receptors extracellularly or intracellularly could convert simple-cell RFs to those similar to complex cells11 12 These experimental data suggest that OTS964 there may be a significant spatial overlap between excitation and inhibition in simple cells and that inhibition may play a crucial role in generating the segregated On/Off RF structure. More recently it has been proposed that this spike threshold increases the difference in functional properties of simple and OTS964 complex cells which normally lie on a continuum if distributions of synaptic responses are considered13-16. This model implies that the push-pull circuit may only apply to the OTS964 “purest” OTS964 simple cells. In order to comprehend how specific RF structures are generated it is critical to understand the distribution patterns of the underlying synaptic inputs. Most of the experimental evidence for the push-pull was based on extracellular recordings of spike responses17-20 or intracellular recordings of membrane potential responses3 8 9 16 21 These responses are the result of integrating excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs as well as voltage-dependent conductances and may not be taken directly as either excitatory or inhibitory synaptic inputs. The synaptic circuit underlying simple-cell RFs requires further examination. Recent studies have exhibited that whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings can be reliably carried out in rodent cortices spike subfields. The level of overlap between the Ion and Ioff as well as between the excitatory and inhibitory subfields of the same contrast (“Ex-In”) was then compared between the putative S-RF (n = 13) and O-RF cells (n = 20) (Fig. 4a). While the Eon and Eoff were more OTS964 segregated in the S-RF cells than the O-RF cells the overlap between the Ion and Ioff is usually similarly large in the two groups. In the S-RF cells the average OI of Ex-In is usually OTS964 higher than that of Eon-Eoff but lower than that of Ion-Ioff consistent with the notion that this peaks of the inhibitory subfields were usually located between those of the Eon and Eoff. To further illustrate the Ex-In relationship we measured the normalized peak distance using “+” or “?” sign to indicate that this inhibitory peak locates around the inner or outer side of the excitatory subfield respectively (Fig. 4b left). In the S-RF cells almost all the values were positive indicating that inhibition usually peaked at the inner side of the excitatory subfield (Fig. 4b right). Around the.